User:Mountain

维基百科,自由的百科全书

这是本页的一个历史版本,由110.17.47.196留言2013年6月1日 (六) 07:20编辑。这可能和当前版本存在着巨大的差异。

致维基百科管理员的公开信

尊敬的维基百科管理员女士/先生:

你们好。

从媒体上了解到,你们是一个优秀的团队,八十几个人,管理着世界上最大的百科全书,记录、传播着各种各样知识、信息,为人类文明的发展、传承做出了卓越的、不可替代的贡献。

可,这几天,你们中的某一个或某几个人,犯了一个非常愚蠢的错误。那就是删除了“顾晓军”词条,且禁止讨论。这是十分不正常的现象。

正如我在《致维基百科创办者 Jimmy Wales 的公开信》中所说,顾晓军先生是中国当代大思想家、大作家。他首创的“平民主义民主”、“公正第一”、“民权至上”等思想——“顾晓军主义”——开始被越来越多的人所接受,这撼动了东、西方传统价值观,触动了世界上许多党派、集团的利益,他的言论遭到各种媒体的大范围封杀,卑鄙的触角已经延伸到维基百科内部,玷污了维基百科的声誉。

所以,请你们尽快纠正错误,还顾晓军以公正。

再,知道维基百科现在拥有285个语种的版本,建议你们将顾晓军的中文词条恢复后,尽快将此词条翻译成尽可能多的语言版本,让全世界的人们,都可以读到顾晓军先生“公正第一”的相关论述,感受人类思想的最新成果,让“顾晓军主义”照亮人类的前途。

顾晓军词条各语言版本,应以中文版为准,及时更新。

尊敬的维基百科管理员,让我们一起,将顾晓军词条建成为一棵参天大树。

最后,麻烦您将贝车的《致维基百科创办者 Jimmy Wales 的公开信》转发给吉米•威尔士先生本人。

贝车致谢! 中国网民 贝车2013.5.29

An open letter to Wikipedia administration translate:Laoli

Hello,all the respected administratins:

From the media I learned that you are a exellent team.You have only more than eighty people managing the largest encyclopedia in the world.You are recording,spreading a wide variety knowledge and information.You have done so exellent and irreplaceable contribution for the development and inherit of human civilization.

But,one or a few of you made a very stupid mistake.That is ,deleted the words〝GU Xiaojun〞entry,and prohibit the discussion about him.This is very very unusual. Just like what I said in 《open letter to the funder of Wikipedia Jimmy Wales》,Mr. Gu Xiaojun is a contemporary great thinker and a famous writer in China.

So,what my request is to correct the error and give Gu Xiaojun a fair.

     Besides,Wikipedia has 285 language versions.You can translate Gu Xiaojun’s entry to more and more other language after the restoration of it.Then more people around the world can read Mr. Gu Xiaojun’s 〝Fair is the top value〞discourses,feeling the latest achievements of human mind,let the 〝Gu Xiaojunism〞does it’s work for the future of human.

    Gu Xiaojun’s entry should be prevailed in Chinese version and timely update.

    Dear Wikipedia administrations,please built Gu Xiaojun’s entry as a towering tree together with us,thank you!

    Finally,could you send 《open letter to the funder of Wikipedia Jimmy Wales》to Jimmy Wales!

Thanks a lot!

Chinese netizen: Beiche 2013.5.29


致维基百科创办者 Jimmy Wales 的公开信

尊敬的吉米•威尔士先生: 你好。

      在维基百科中文版首页上,赫然写着“每个人都能自由地分享人类知识的总和。这是我们的承诺。”我每每被这承诺感动、鼓舞,并积极地投入到维基百科的伟大事业中。
     
     然而,这几天发生了一些事情,让我对维基百科的承诺产生了怀疑,乃至气愤。考虑到您日理百机,不可能顾及到每一具体业务,因此给您写信告知真相。
     维基百科“顾晓军”词条被粗暴地删除了。时间是2013年5月25日,(六)5:43,之后“顾粉”们多次重发,又多次被删除,删除人是Yhz1221、Shizhao、乌拉跨氪。删除理由是所谓“版权争议”,但在(链接略)上是顾晓军先生自己的博客的一个常规引用,不存在版权争议。且“Talk:顾晓军”页面也不准编辑。按照维基百科规则,删除的词条,应允许用户进行讨论,可“顾晓军”词条不允许讨论。何其霸道!
     顾晓军先生是中国当代大思想家、大作家。他首创的“平民主义民主”、“公正第一”、“民权至上”等思想——“顾晓军主义”——开始被越来越多的人所接受,这撼动了东、西方传统价值观,触动了世界上许多党派、集团的利益,他的言论遭到各种媒体的大范围封杀,卑鄙的触角已经延伸到维基百科内部,玷污了维基百科的声誉。
     “顾晓军主义”超越了当今主流、非主流思想家、哲学家的理论成果,为世界纷争的妥善解决提供了认识论、方法论。仅凭这一点,“顾晓军”的名字就可彪炳史册、流芳百世。且,他的文学作品也大量传世,经典之作俯拾皆是。

    2013年以来,全球“顾粉”们发起了一场空前的、声势浩大的活动,那就是推荐顾晓军先生获取诺贝尔和平奖。这个活动已经引起了诺贝尔奖评委们的高度关注。顾晓军先生极有可能成为2013年诺贝尔和平奖得主。
     尊敬的威尔士先生,将“顾晓军” 词条排除在维基百科之外,是维基百科的耻辱,维基百科的诺言也会沦为全世界的笑柄。

慎思之。 中国网民 贝车 2013.5.28

An open letter to Wikipedia founder Mr. Jimmy Wales (translate:laoli ) Hi,Mr.Jimmy Wales!

 It is very clearly writed “everyone can freely share in the sum of human knowledge here.This is our commitment.”on the homepage of Chinese wesion Wikipedia.I was moved,inspired by this promise, and engaged in the great cause of Wikipedia.

     However,something happened these days,i was very angry and began to suspect the promise of Wikipedia.I know you are so busy that you can not notice every specific business.Then,I decided to write down the truth.

The “Gu Xiaojun”entry of Wikipedia was rudely removed.The time was 5/25/2013 05:43 AM(sat).After that, all Gu’s fans upload time and time again,but they were all deleted in the end .It is Yhz1221、Shizhao and the span of krypton who did it.And the reason why to delete is “copyright disputes”,but the link is Gu Xiaojun’s own blog,the dispte is not exist indeed.Besides, the website “talk:Gu Xiaojun” is not allowed to be edited.According to Wikipedia rules,the user should be allowed to discuss about the deleted entry.But the “Gu Xiaojun” entry is not allowed to be discussed.It is overbearing!

Mr. Gu Xiaojun is a contemporary great thinker,a famous writer.He pioneered the “populist democracy”, “FAIR is the top value” “civil liberties first”and other thoughts——Gu Xiaojunism——had been accepted by more and more people.Also,his thoughts rocked both eastern and western traditional values,touched many world political parties,interest groups.So,his remarks were widly blocked by all various media.,dastardly tentacles has been extended to internal Wikipedia,tarnished the reputation of Wikipedia.

“Gu Xiaojun doctrine”beyond today’s all the mainstream and non-mainstream thinkers,philosophers theoretical results. It provided epistemology and methodology to properly resove disputes aroud the world.Only rely on this point, the name of “Gu Xioajun” will shine through history and immortal.Moreover,a large number of his literary works were handed down,classic among them can be founded everywhere on the internet.

     Since 2013,the global Gu’s fans initiated an unprecedented, a mammoth event,that is recommending Mr. Gu Xiaojun to get the Nobel Peace Prize.The activity has caused great concern by the Nobel judges. It is very likely that Mr. Gu Xiaojun will be the 2013 Nobel Peace Prize winner.

Dear Mr. Wales,it will be a shame if exclude “Gu Xiaojun” entry on Wikipedia,and your prom ise will become the laughing stock of the world.

   Please think twice about it  !

Chinese netizen Beiche 2013.5.28

虚拟行星的建构计划

我最近已经把主要的业余精力放到了我发起的一个虚拟行星的建构计划,该计划和维基百科一样,秉持开放和分享的理念,是一个致力于知识和教育的实验平台,也欢迎大家前去参与。

维基入门

工作台

小记

常用工具

上海群组公告栏


中国大陆维基人布告栏最新消息

[張貼]

歡迎使用本佈告板分享關於社群之間的資訊與公告。

  • [公告] 欢迎参与中国专题的构建工作。
  • [通知] 條目質量提升計劃有整合各城市主題提升的子計畫,請各城市專題參與者前往籌備。
  • [公告] 請協助維護中國大陸新聞動態2024年中國大陸
  • [公告] 請將代碼{{cnBoard}}複製至個人用戶頁,可以即時收到最新消息,並請至報到處簽到。
  • [请求] 现有一个汇集各省(自治区、直辖市)的线上政务服务软件的列表式模板已初具规模,并已经形成草稿。欢迎各位维基人指出并改正各省政务服务软件名称的错误。谢谢。(点击这里直达

Monobook样式表中文维基百科使用统计Wikipedia索引User:Mountain/繁简转换测试